What is a Spring-Loaded Door?

February 26, 2009 at 3:55 pm | Posted in Industry Topics, Product Reviews | 3 Comments

All doors, whether commercial, residential or utilitarian, are either “loaded” or “unloaded.”  The term refers to the presence (or absence) of springs in the hinges.  Whether or not a door is loaded will affect not only the performance of the door, but also the type of door hardware that can be applied to it.

By fitting hinges with springs, doors will close automatically.  The speed of closure depends upon the type of spring and the tension.  Spring loaded doors may be found on commercial buildings and also on utility buildings like backyard sheds and garage doors.  It’s also common to find springs on the hinges of residential storm doors

The obvious advantage to choosing a spring loaded door is knowing that the door will close automatically.  This is an important security feature, and gives extra assurance to home owners who have children that may forget to close doors behind them.

It’s important to choose door hardware that is compatible with loaded doors.  Incompatible hardware may cause damage to the door, malfunction, or simply not work at all.  Exit devices are one example of commercial door hardware that must be compatible with loaded doors.  Some exit devices, like the Von Duprin XP99 Rim Device can be applied to both loaded and unloaded doors.  The XP99-F device has the added feature of fire protection, since it is rated for fire doors.

Another option to springs for closing doors automatically is the door closer.  Door closers have the added advantage of more control over door closing speed.  This is especially important in commercial buildings that must consider all types of patrons, including the disabled.  Door closing speed can be adjusted so that doors do not close too quickly for visitors in wheelchairs.  Some models, like the LCN 4040 Series have extra options when it comes to the type of arm desired.

The LCN 4040 Series

The LCN 4040 Series

How Exit Devices are Graded by the BHMA

February 19, 2009 at 6:13 pm | Posted in Industry Topics | 1 Comment

Before a BHMA (Builders Home Manufacturers Association) approved exit device hits store shelves, it has gone through a systematic testing process.  Exit devices, such as those manufactured by Von Duprin, which pass the test and receive BHMA certification can be relied upon by consumers for both quality and safety.

During the testing process, which is conducted by independent laboratories according to BHMA specifications, exit devices are given a final “grade.”  They are sold as Grade 1, Grade 2 and Grade 3. Each grade denotes particular qualities about that model. The grading system is useful for builders and contractors when it comes to choosing the right kind of exit device for a specific application.

The Builders Home Manufacturers Association tests exit devices on six points: inside operational, flush bolt, outside operational, strength and material evaluation. The grade is assigned depending upon where a particular exit device “scores” on these points[1].  

Some points, such as “Exit” and “Force to latch door” are the same standard for all three grades of exit devices.  Other points set out differing standards for the three separate grades, such as the amount of force that a particular grade has the ability to withstand.

The higher the grade, the stronger and more durable the exit device is.  This is one consideration to make when it comes to choosing the right device for a particular door.

However, other factors are important too, and must be weighed carefully against the type of use that the door will receive.  For example, it doesn’t necessarily make sense to put a higher grade of exit device on an exterior door in a senior citizen’s residence in the hopes that the device will not have to be replaced as frequently.  In this case, the device may not see the same use of force as an exit device in a school for example.  A lower grade may make better economical sense in this situation.

 

[1] Builders Hardware Manufacturers AssociationStandards at a Glance.  “ANSI/BHMA A156.3-2001, American National Standard for Exit Devices.”  2001.

The BHMA’s Role in Ensuring Quality in Exit Devices

February 12, 2009 at 7:03 pm | Posted in Industry Topics | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Thanks to organizations like the Builders Hardware Manufacturers Association (BHMA), consumers and contractors alike can be assured that commercial hardware products like Von Duprin exit devices are safe.  The BHMA was formed in 1925 to[1] promote the general development and welfare of the builders hardware industry and its member companies.” 

BHMA membership is comprised of manufacturers of builders hardware.  In fact, according to the organization, eighty percent of US-based builders hardware manufacturers currently hold membership.  It is a testament to the widespread credibility that the BHMA has gained in the commercial hardware and building industry.

The BHMA has a five-point mission statement, indicating an interest in ensuring public welfare and safety when interacting with commercial hardware products.  The BHMA maintains an active role in monitoring governmental actions which have an impact on the building industry and advocating for safe practices and quality standards.

One of the Builders Hardware Manufacturers Association’s major responsibilities lies within the testing and certification of commercial hardware products, particularly locks, exit devices(such as Von Duprin), door controls and hinges.  The BHMA, along with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI,) has developed a set of standardized, industry-accepted codes governing the make-up and performance of these types of commercial hardware products.

Manufacturers of these products may voluntarily submit a specific product for testing, which is overseen by the BHMA.  Tests are performed by a third-party independent laboratory facility in accordance with the ANSI/BHMA standards.  Products which meet or exceed these standards receive a BHMA certification.

It is not mandatory for commercial hardware manufacturers to submit its products for testing.  However, BHMA certification carries so much weight in the building industry in the United States that it would be very difficult to market a product without a BHMA endorsement.  Most manufacturers in the US willingly submit their products for testing, and also allow for regular facility inspections which ensure that previously certified products are still being manufactured in accordance to BHMA standards.  Those that aren’t run the risk of being de-certified.

All exit devices, including those manufactured by Von Duprin, are evaluated on five points: inside operational, flush bolt, outside operational, strength and material evaluation.  Individual exit device models are then assigned a grade according to the results of this evaluation.  These tests help to ensure that exit devices are safe, adhere to a uniform standard and will perform as expected under the circumstances which they are intended to be used for.

NEXT WEEK: The Grading System for Exit Devices

[1] Builders Hardware Manufacturers Association.  BMA Home.  http://www.buildershardware.com/index.html

Do Your Commercial Doors Suffer From “Door Abuse?” Upgrading to a Von Duprin XP Model

February 5, 2009 at 4:01 pm | Posted in Industry Topics, Product Reviews | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , ,

Commercial doors often take a beating, and some even more than others.  “Door abuse” is common in schools, community and recreation centers, church buildings, sports complexes, and any place else you might find a combination of high traffic and high energy human forces.  “Door abuse” is a tongue-in-cheek way to describe commercial doors which are prone to being bashed into and thrown open with large amounts of speed and force.  This type of abuse can lead to wearing and breakage of hardware, deterioration of the door frame, damage to surrounding walls and wear and tear on door stoppers.

A well-designed commercial door in one of these abuse-prone areas will be manufactured to absorb some of this extra force.  However, the door hardware often suffers the most, leading to quick wear and costly frequent replacements of parts or entire units.

This is one reason Von Duprin created its XP exit device model.  The Von Duprin XP 98 Series rim device takes the original 98 Series device one step further, creating a product that will not deteriorate under “door abuse” in high traffic, high energy buildings and areas.  The XP 98 has an added innovative latching concept.  The latch bolt and strike design in the XP 98 increases static load force resistance.  This keeps doors from being pushed or pulled open too violently, offering a small level of resistance to being “flung” open forcefully.  In fact, it provides over 2000 pounds of static force resistance, without making it unduly difficult for doors to be opened.

The Von Duprin XP 98 Series Rim/Exit Device, available from Popular Hardware.

The Von Duprin XP 98 Series Rim/Exit Device, available from Popular Hardware.

Fortunately, the XP 98 Series is made to fit within the foundation of existing Von Duprin 98 Series commercial door hardware.  This means that doors already outfitted with this series need not replace entire units in order to upgrade to the XP.  The XP part is merely substituted for the regular 98 series rim device.  This reduces cost as well as the labor involved in replacement.

The ICC and NFPA Fallout: The OTHER Building Code

January 29, 2009 at 6:40 pm | Posted in Industry Topics | 18 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , ,

The International Building Code is a relatively new model building code, having first been published just over a decade ago in 1997.  Prior to its development, there were three model building codes in use throughout the United States.  Each had been developed by a different industry entity, and used in particular parts (West Coast, Southern U.S. and Midwest/East Coast) of the United States.

One of the main reasons that the International Building Code was written was to unify these three codes and make one cohesive building code, which could be used and understood in all parts of the United States.  It was the combined work of the three original code developers that resulted in the drafting and subsequent publication of the International Building Code.

What may be lesser known about the drafting of this code by the International Code Council is that the original participating groups also included the National Fire Protection Association.  The NFPA was established in 1896, and already had a rich history by the time the writing of the IBC was undertaken in 1997.  The NFPA and all of its standards had gained wide acceptance in the industry, so that 100 years after its inception, it made sense to include the NFPA in the drafting of the IBC.

The mission of the National Fire Protection Agency is [1]: “To reduce the worldwide burden of fire and other hazzards on the quality of life by providing and advocating consensus codes and standards, research, training and education.”  The non-profit NFPA claims a membership of approximately 81,000 individuals and about eighty companies.  The NFPA was in its early years when the Iroquois Theater Fire took the lives of 600 people in less than an hour, the same fire that lead to the invention of the Von Duprin exit device.  This tragedy came to publicly emphasize the need for cohesive national public standards on fire safety and prevention.  In the subsequent years, the NFPA helped developed codes and standards for many different industries, as well as recommendations for homeowners and renters.

When the ICC began consulting with the NFPA on the drafting of the International Building Code, it appeared to be a logical and mutually agreeable partnership.  However, after only the first draft of the IBC, the National Fire Protection Association and the International Code Council the two organizations reached an impasse.  The disagreements stemmed, in part, from differences over costs to individual companies in training and implementing the recommendations in the first draft of the IBC.  Several attempts to reach a consensus failed, and eventually the NFPA left the table altogether.

The ICC and its other partnering organizations went on to complete the International Building Code, despite the absence of that key player.  Meanwhile, the NFPA partnered with other industry groups to develop an alternative set of codes, the Comprehensive Consensus Codes (C3).  The C3 includes three sets of codes [2] on fire safety and prevention: the NFPA 5,000, the NFPA 101, and the NFPA 1.

Currently, it’s up to individual states and regions which and how many sets of codes to adopt.  The IBC is widely accepted across the United States, and some areas also adhere to the more stringent recommendations of the C3.

 

[1] National Fire Protection Association.  “About Us.” 2009.  http://www.nfpa.org/categoryList.asp?categoryID=143&URL=About%20Us

[2] National Fire Protection Association.  “List of NFPA Codes and Standards.”  2009.  http://www.nfpa.org/aboutthecodes/list_of_codes_and_standards.asp

Popular Hardware:  Fire-rated commercial door hardware.

The Development of the International Building Code

January 22, 2009 at 6:21 pm | Posted in Industry Topics | 1 Comment
Tags: , , ,

PART ONE: What is the International Building Code?

Even the average layman understands that buildings , whether commercial or residential, which are constructed in the United States, Canada and other parts of the world, are subject to certain building standards.  Typically though, only those who are associated with the industry understand what those standards are and where they come from.  The International Building Code is one such set of standards.

The International Building Code (IBC) is a “model building code.”  It is a set of safety and design standards by which architects, contractors and builders can adhere to to ensure that structures which are built are safe for habitation.The IBC is updated regularly in response to the changing marketplace and new technologies.  The newest edition of the International Building Code is scheduled to be released in February, 2009.

The International Building Code was developed by the International Code Council (ICC).  The ICC is [1] “a membership association dedicated to building safety and fire prevention [and which] develops the codes used to construct residential and commercial buildings, including homes and schools.”  The IBC was developed and written in collaboration with industry experts and other organizations with interest in the construction and public safety industry.

The purpose for developing the International Building Code was to provide a uniform and coherent set of building and safety standards that could be used and understood by all in the industry.  The first edition of the IBC was published in 1997, and within a few years it gained wide acceptance within the industry.

The International Building Code governs thousands of details regarding commercial and residential construction, from the breaking of ground to the hammering of the final nail.  It outlines guidelines for sprinkler systems, doors and locks, types of exit devices which can be used, wall thickness, and many more details.

Within just a few years of its publication, the IBC was widely adopted by regions and states across North America.  However, it is by no means the only model building code.  It has been left largely to individual states to choose whether to adopt the International Building Code or another set of standards.

In fact, it was a disagreement in principle between the International Code Council and the National Fire Protection Association which led to the development of another model building code.

 

[1] The International Code Council.  “About ICC: An Introduction to the ICC.”  2009.  http://www.iccsafe.org/news/about/

Next Week: PART TWO- The ICC and NFPA Fallout: The Other Model Building Code

Door Hardware Contractors: Need help interpreting the IBC?  Download the Von Duprin Fire, Life Safety & Accessibility Codes reference guide in PDF format for free at Von Duprin.

What is Electric Strike?

January 15, 2009 at 9:33 pm | Posted in Industry Topics | 3 Comments
Tags: , , , ,
The Von Duprin 6112 Electric Strike

The Von Duprin 6112 Electric Strike

Exit devices, like those manufactured by Von Duprin, allow doors to remain locked to public access (usually on the exterior side of the door.)  However, the door may still be opened quickly and easily from the inside without the use of a key. (Read more.)  Entry from the outside of a door outfitted with an exit device can only be obtained with a key.

Electric strikes for exit devices offer an extra measure of convenience suitable for a number of applications.  An electric strike plate replaces the standard fixed strike faceplate which is normally mounted within the door jamb.  Like a fixed strike, the electric strike has a ramped surface which allows the bolt to pass over the plate and lock into place.  When someone pushes the exit bar from inside, the latch retracts the same as for a fixed strike, allowing the door to be opened.

Electric strikes, however, offer the added convenience of being able to remotely open the door upon which it is installed without the use of manual force.  By activating the remote control device, the electric strike’s ramped surface pivots out of the way in response to electrical current.  The door can then be pushed open from the exterior without the use of a key, door knob or lever.

Most electric-strike systems employ a buzzer-type alarm.  The buzzer lets the person on the outside of the door know that the electric strike plate has been de-activated and entry is possible.  The length of time that the door remains accessible from the exterior is determined by the remote control setting inside.

Electric strike exit systems are suitable for a variety of applications where controlled access is necessary.  They are frequently found on apartment buildings and condominiums, so that only residents can access the building from the exterior with a key.  However, residents inside the building can also remotely open exterior doors to allow guests to enter the building.  Office and government buildings also frequently use electric strike systems to control public access.

Next Week: The Two Types of Electric Strikes

Von Duprin Makes Building Navigation Easier for the Visually Impaired

January 10, 2009 at 2:55 am | Posted in Industry Topics | 1 Comment
Tags: , , ,

The unique design of the original Von Duprin device has changed since the original 88 Series.  Design and technology improvements as well as the development of new materials and components makes today’s Von Duprin exit devices stronger, more durable, and easier to use.  Products such as the Von Duprin line of exit devices are easily maneuvered and deployed by children, adults, the handicapped and even the blind.

Von Duprin has made further improvements to a number of its exit device products recently for use by the visually impaired.  The company has produced braille touchpads embossed with the words “Caution, Stairwell” which can be applied as an option to a number of exit devices, including Von Duprin’s stainless steel push bar series’ 33, 35, 98 and 99.

The braille touchpad can be purchased as an extra option along with the above mentioned exit device series’.  The touchpad informs those who are visually impaired that a stairwell lies past the door on which the exit device and touchpad is applied.  This is not just a mere convenience, but a critical safety measure designed to protect the visually impaired.

Braille signs and touchpads in public buildings are relatively new in the last decade or two.  This type of signage is an essential part of making every day living for the visually impaired not just possible, but safe, easy and fulfilling.

Despite this, many locales do not have bylaws or building codes which necessitate and govern the use of braille touchpads within public buildings.  In many cases, the blind and the visually impaired must continue to rely on the use of guide animals, companions, sound cues and instinct to navigate public buildings safely.  Groups which advocate for the blind and visually impaired urge commercial property owners to install braille touchpads in critical areas like elevators, stairwells and doors.

Undoubtedly, companies like Von Duprin, which are committed to easy and safe access to public buildings for all types of people, will continue to develop products which address the needs of the visually impaired customer.

Question: Have you or has anyone you know ever experienced difficulty navigating a public/commercial building due to visual impairment and lack of braille touchpads in key parts of the building?  Please leave your comments.

Commercial Applications for Alarmed Exit Devices

January 1, 2009 at 9:18 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments
Tags: , , , ,

Exit devices have come a long way since the original Von Duprin 88 Series of 1908. Design improvements and modern technology have allowed companies like Von Duprin to create products that address changing business security needs while still keeping human safety a top priority.  The alarmed exit device is one such modern innovation.

 

The primary function of an exit device is to allow business and commercial property owners to limit access to a building from the outside while allowing people indoors to leave the building quickly and easily in an emergency.  Exit devices, when applied to doors, keep doors locked on one side (the outside, in the case of exterior doors.)  The opposite side (inside) is outfitted with a crash bar or panic bar.  Applying a small amount of force to the bar releases the locking mechanism, making a quit departure possible.

 

Adding an alarm component to a standard crash bar gives an extra measure of security.  Alarmed exit devices will emit a buzzing, beeping or ringing sound when the crash bar is activated.  Alarmed exit devices are typically installed on doors that are not intended to be used for regular public traffic.  Rather, they are applied to emergency/fire exits as required by law.  Employees and patrons are prohibited from using these doors to exit the property, except in the event of an emergency (i.e. fire, robbery, threat, etc.)

 

Alarmed exit devices make suitable security solutions for businesses such as:

 

1) Restaurants.  Restaurants typically designate only one or two sets of doors for public use.  Other doors may include staff-only entrances and emergency/fire exits.  By applying alarmed exit devices to these doors, owners/managers are immediately aware that the door has been used.

 

2) Retail establishments.  Grocery, clothing, department and other types of stores can control theft (i.e. snatch-and-runs) as well as unauthorized employee use (i.e. employees allowing non-staff into restricted areas) by using alarmed exit devices.

 

3) Care Homes.  Care homes can monitor door usage with alarmed exit devices, preventing vulnerable residents from being able to wander out of the building unnoticed.

 

4) Schools/Daycare centers.  Children can be safely contained inside the building, and teachers/caregivers will know immediately if a child tries to exit an alarmed door.  Staff and children will still be able to make a fast exit in an emergency situation.

 

Alarmed exit devices, such as Von Duprin’s Guard-X Device, are the perfect solution for business and commercial property owners. It’s etched with a message readily identifying it as an alarmed door intended for emergency use only.  Owners can rest assured that their properties and inventories as well as patrons and staff will be safe and protected.

The Von Duprin Guard-X Device from Popular Hardware

The Von Duprin Guard-X Device from Popular Hardware

The Trio that became “Von Duprin”

December 24, 2008 at 8:09 pm | Posted in The Evolution of Von Duprin Exit Devices | 2 Comments

“The screams of the children for their mothers and mothers for their children I shall carry in my memory until my dying day.”                                         

– Frank Slosson, Secretary-Treasurer of the Bain Wagon Works, Iroquois Theater Fire survivor

 

fire_iroquistheatre

Firefighters work to extinguish the last of the smoke from the Iroquois Theater fire. Students in the Northwestern University building across the alley extended ladders (pictured in the background) from their windows to theater windows in an attempt to rescue patrons trapped inside. Dozens were saved thanks to their efforts, while others perished or were injured when they fell to the ground below.

 

 

It’s a common misconception among consumers that “Von Duprin” is the name of a single person, the creator of the Von Duprin line of products.  In reality, Von Duprin reflects a three-way partnership that brought the brand name into existence with its first invention: the exit device.

 

Carl Prinzler was the key member in the Von Duprin business triangle.  Though the smoke from the Iroquois Theater fire had dissipated, Prinzler couldn’t dismiss the idea that the fire was a senseless tragedy that could have been prevented with a relatively simple hardware innovation. 

 

Prinzler, a long-time hardware salesman had the motivation, but lacked the means with which to bring his idea to fruition alone.  And so he worked his own personal contact list and pitched his idea of the “exit device,” or “panic/crash bar” to his neighbor and trusted friend, Henry DuPont.

 

DuPont had a background in architectural engineering.  Prinzler described the problems with the exits in the Iroquois Theater to DuPont, and his idea for a device which, when applied to a door, would allow it to be locked from the outside.  This would prevent any unauthorized entry.  From the inside, the door could be unlocked easily and quickly, allowing for a fast escape during an emergency.

 

Using Prinzler’s ideas, DuPont set his engineering skills to work and created the world’s first exit device.  When applied to a door, it would remain locked on the exterior.  The only way to open the door was with a key.  Inside, however, the locking mechanism could be released by pushing on a large bar mounted across the width of the door.  In fact, in a panic situation all that is necessary is for a body to hurl against it for an escape that takes mere seconds.  This is where the term “crash” or “panic” bar originated.

 

Had the exits doors in the Iroquois Theater been outfitted with such devices, it is likely that hundreds of lives could have been saved.  It most certainly would have saved those people who perished because they hurled themselves at locked doors in an attempt to escape, only to be trampled or suffocated by others subsequently hurling themselves at the same door.

 

Once the first exit device had been designed, it was time for the duo to look for a third “partner.”  For though the two were able to come up with a working model, neither had the finances or platform to market their ingenious invention.  And so the third partner was added to the network.  Prinzler looked to his own employer, the Vonnegut Hardware Company, to help him produce and market his exit device.

 

Vonnegut Hardware became the world’s first distributor of Prinzler’s exit device.  It was sold under the name “Von Duprin” to reflect the participation of all three members of the team: Vonnegut, DuPont and Prinzler.  It’s original “88 Series Crossbar” panic bar is still on the market today, though numerous design and manufacturing improvements have been made since the first version went on sale 100 years ago.

 

In just a few short decades Prinzler’s life-saving device became mandatory on every public building in America.  Today panic bars are mandatory on most public buildings in most every developed country in the world.  If not for Prinzler’s outrage at the loss of some 600 lives, the world may not have such a mechanism today.

 

The Von Duprin exit device is available today in dozens of styles suitable for every application.  They meet federal regulations for both safety and fire security.  The Von Duprin brand name is now a brand of the Ingersoll Rand Company.

« Previous PageNext Page »


Entries and comments feeds.