The Trio that became “Von Duprin”

December 24, 2008 at 8:09 pm | Posted in The Evolution of Von Duprin Exit Devices | 2 Comments

“The screams of the children for their mothers and mothers for their children I shall carry in my memory until my dying day.”                                         

- Frank Slosson, Secretary-Treasurer of the Bain Wagon Works, Iroquois Theater Fire survivor

 

fire_iroquistheatre

Firefighters work to extinguish the last of the smoke from the Iroquois Theater fire. Students in the Northwestern University building across the alley extended ladders (pictured in the background) from their windows to theater windows in an attempt to rescue patrons trapped inside. Dozens were saved thanks to their efforts, while others perished or were injured when they fell to the ground below.

 

 

It’s a common misconception among consumers that “Von Duprin” is the name of a single person, the creator of the Von Duprin line of products.  In reality, Von Duprin reflects a three-way partnership that brought the brand name into existence with its first invention: the exit device.

 

Carl Prinzler was the key member in the Von Duprin business triangle.  Though the smoke from the Iroquois Theater fire had dissipated, Prinzler couldn’t dismiss the idea that the fire was a senseless tragedy that could have been prevented with a relatively simple hardware innovation. 

 

Prinzler, a long-time hardware salesman had the motivation, but lacked the means with which to bring his idea to fruition alone.  And so he worked his own personal contact list and pitched his idea of the “exit device,” or “panic/crash bar” to his neighbor and trusted friend, Henry DuPont.

 

DuPont had a background in architectural engineering.  Prinzler described the problems with the exits in the Iroquois Theater to DuPont, and his idea for a device which, when applied to a door, would allow it to be locked from the outside.  This would prevent any unauthorized entry.  From the inside, the door could be unlocked easily and quickly, allowing for a fast escape during an emergency.

 

Using Prinzler’s ideas, DuPont set his engineering skills to work and created the world’s first exit device.  When applied to a door, it would remain locked on the exterior.  The only way to open the door was with a key.  Inside, however, the locking mechanism could be released by pushing on a large bar mounted across the width of the door.  In fact, in a panic situation all that is necessary is for a body to hurl against it for an escape that takes mere seconds.  This is where the term “crash” or “panic” bar originated.

 

Had the exits doors in the Iroquois Theater been outfitted with such devices, it is likely that hundreds of lives could have been saved.  It most certainly would have saved those people who perished because they hurled themselves at locked doors in an attempt to escape, only to be trampled or suffocated by others subsequently hurling themselves at the same door.

 

Once the first exit device had been designed, it was time for the duo to look for a third “partner.”  For though the two were able to come up with a working model, neither had the finances or platform to market their ingenious invention.  And so the third partner was added to the network.  Prinzler looked to his own employer, the Vonnegut Hardware Company, to help him produce and market his exit device.

 

Vonnegut Hardware became the world’s first distributor of Prinzler’s exit device.  It was sold under the name “Von Duprin” to reflect the participation of all three members of the team: Vonnegut, DuPont and Prinzler.  It’s original “88 Series Crossbar” panic bar is still on the market today, though numerous design and manufacturing improvements have been made since the first version went on sale 100 years ago.

 

In just a few short decades Prinzler’s life-saving device became mandatory on every public building in America.  Today panic bars are mandatory on most public buildings in most every developed country in the world.  If not for Prinzler’s outrage at the loss of some 600 lives, the world may not have such a mechanism today.

 

The Von Duprin exit device is available today in dozens of styles suitable for every application.  They meet federal regulations for both safety and fire security.  The Von Duprin brand name is now a brand of the Ingersoll Rand Company.

The Partnership that Changed the Way the World Looked at Commercial Security

December 18, 2008 at 9:49 pm | Posted in The Evolution of Von Duprin Exit Devices | 3 Comments

PART TWO: Prinzler’s Panic Bar Revolutionizes Commercial Security

 

The inside of the Iroquois Theater after the inferno that took the lives of over 600 people.

The inside of the Iroquois Theater after the inferno that took the lives of over 600 people.

 

 

 

Carl Prinzler was moved beyond mere emotions at the news of the Iroquois Theater Fire. Realizing that he barely escaped his own demise, Prinzler vowed that he would do whatever was in his power to ensure that a similar tragedy never occurred again.  Though Prinzler was little more than a hardware salesman, his outrage along with his knowledge of tools and knack for design led him to invent the world’s first panic bar.

 

The panic bar, also known as the crash bar, is an exit device.  When applied to a door, it allows a door to remain locked to anyone outside.  Inside though, the door is easily opened by simply pushing on the bar (i.e. crashing into it with bodily force.)  This device was a respectful balance between a building owner’s right to keep non-paying customers or would-be thieves out while still ensuring that patrons already inside could exit the premises quickly in an emergency.

 

A big part of the problem with the Iroquois Theater rested within the design of its door locks.  Most of the doors had been outfitted with bascule locks.  They are virtually obsolete today.  Though they were popular in European theaters in the early 1900′s, they were relatively unheard of and infrequently used in North America.

 

Further complicating the matter was the fact that many of the fire exit doors were hidden.  In deference to aesthetics, they had been covered by facades or curtains to maintain a pristine and uniform appearance.  For the few patrons who were able to locate the doors, fewer still were able to work the unfamiliar bascule locks, resulting in dozens being trapped inside the burning theater.

 

Patrons in the balcony fared worst.  They had been locked in to prevent anyone from sneaking into the more expensive seats on the floor.  Only a handful of visitors were able to escape the balcony before a backdraft caused a fireball to instantly incinerate the upstairs seating area and all who remained there.

 

Had Prinzler’s panic bar been available, the death toll would most certainly have been much less than the 602 who perished that day.  Not only would patrons have been able to escape the locked theater, panic bars would likely have prevented the deaths of those who didn’t succumb to the smoke or flames but were killed from being crushed against doors and other people.

 

Prinzler, the humble hardware salesman-turned-activist/inventor had the know-how and wherewithal to design the panic bar.  What he lacked was engineering expertise and financial backing.  Thus Prinzler entered what would become a most historical partnership which led to the formation of the Von Duprin brand.

 

Next Week

PART THREE: The Trio that Became Von Duprin

The Partnership that Changed the Way the World Looked at Commercial Security

December 12, 2008 at 12:27 am | Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments
Tags: , , ,

PART ONE: The Iroquois Theater Tragedy and How it Inspired One Man

 

The Iroquois Theater, Circa 1903, shortly after it burned inside.

The Iroquois Theater, Circa 1903, shortly after it burned inside.

 

 

Commercial security strategies and products have come a long way in the last century.  Prior to the early 20th century, human safety was a much lower priority for the business owner than protecting his or her own interests, property and inventory.

 

Attitudes began changing, however, as the 1900′s dawned.  Innovators began to seek ways to balance protection of business, property and financial welfare with protection of the very people who made business possible: customers.  One of those innovators was Carl Prinzler, though he didn’t necessarily set out to become an inventor.  Prinzler literally changed the world through the circumstances of one particular event, a tragedy of human loss that he just couldn’t shake.

 

Prinzler worked as a manager for the Vonnegut Hardware Company in Indianapolis, Indiana.  It was in 1903 that Prinzler had been scheduled to attend a showing of the musical “Mr. Bluebeard” at the newly-opened Iroquois Theater in Chicago.  A last minute meeting caused Prinzler to have to miss the live performance, a twist of fate that would haunt him for years to follow.

 

The Iroquois Theater was, in fact, a marvel of the latest in building technology.  Its architectural exterior design was a marvel to behold, with its stone columnades and expanse of glass adorned with festive wreaths added for its holiday season grand opening.  The theater was advertised on its playbills as “Absolutely Fireproof.” This may have been in deference to nervous Chicagoans who still remembered the deadly Great Chicago Fire some thirty years prior.

 

Marvel or not, corners were cut when it came to the building’s final phase of construction.  Originally slated to open in the late spring of 1904, anxious theater owners pressured contractors to rush the work.  They hoped to take advantage of holiday spenders and visitors to the Chicago area by opening at Christmas time. 

 

It was December 30, just five days after Christmas and 37 days after the “fireproof” theater was opened that Prinzler missed that scheduled performance of “Mr. Bluebeard.”  Had he not been called away, he would have been one of some 2,000 patrons who attended the theater that day, despite the fact that the theater had a seating capacity of just over 1700. 

 

It was during the second act that a spotlight shorted, sending sparks into a nearby curtain in the fly gallery.  The curtain ignited immediately and quickly spread throughout the fly gallery, causing hanging backdrops to burst into flames as they hung from the ceiling.

 

Confused audience members began to murmur and fidget, some believing the glow from backstage was simply special effects, while others realized that disaster was imminent.  A series of mistakes and oversights by theater owners and staff led to rapid spread of the fire from backstage to the seating area. 

 

Patrons clambered over one another to exit the burning building, only to find that most doors had been locked.  Other exits had been gated shut.  Because of the rush to open the theater, most of the building’s fire exits were incomplete.  Some tried to use them anyway ended up plummeting to their deaths in the alleys below.

 

The entire theater was consumed within minutes.  While some patrons managed to escape by kicking down doors or gates, 602 people perished in the blaze for lack of an escape route.  The Iroquois Theater fire claimed more than twice as many lives as the Great Chicago Fire.  It remains, in fact, the deadliest single-building fire in U.S. history.

 

Upon hearing of the fire and its grim death toll, Carl Prinzler was nearly overcome with grief and the heavy weight of the knowledge that he barely escaped his own death.  Prinzler was sickened to learn of the many mistakes and oversights by owners and building workers, along with their blatant disregard for human safety and life itself.

 

This devastating event deeply impacted Prinzler, an average salesman and father.  It motivated him to act on his experience with hardware and business to look for a way to prevent such a tragedy from ever taking another human life.

 

Next week

PART 2: Prinzler’s Panic Bar Revolutionizes Commercial Security

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.